This FDA HRT label change tracker cuts through the headlines to what is actually on the labels. As of July 1, 2026, six menopausal hormone therapy products have FDA-approved updated labels that strip long-standing “boxed warning” language about cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and probable dementia: Bijuva, Divigel, Cenestin, Enjuvia, Prometrium, and Estring. That is the entire public list so far — even though the FDA says 29 drug companiessubmitted proposed changes. So the boxed warning is not uniformly “gone.” It is being lifted product by product, and one warning quietly survived the cut.We read all six FDA labels — and, where we could retrieve them, the FDA approval letters behind them — to build this tracker.
This is a regulatory-label tracker, not medical advice. It documents what the labels say and when they changed. It does not tell anyone whether to start, stop, or change hormone therapy — that is a conversation for you and a clinician, using your current, product-specific FDA label.
The bottom line at a glance
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Verified as of | July 1, 2026 |
| Products with FDA-approved updated labels | 6 |
| HRT categories represented | 4 of 4 (three of the six are systemic estrogen-alone) |
| Companies that submitted proposed labeling changes | 29 |
| Risk statements removed from the boxed warning | 3 — cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, probable dementia |
| Boxed warning retained (one category) | 1 — endometrial cancer, systemic estrogen-alone products only |
| Date the first batch was approved | February 12, 2026 |
Source: FDA, “Menopausal Hormone Therapies with Updated Prescribing Information” (list last updated Feb. 12, 2026) and FDA press announcement (Feb. 12, 2026). Product-level detail independently verified by The HRT Index against each FDA label PDF, July 1, 2026.
Which HRT products have updated FDA labels right now?
Six products, spanning all four FDA hormone-therapy categories, currently appear on the FDA’s public list of menopausal hormone therapies with updated prescribing information. They are not evenly split across the categories — three of the six are systemic estrogen-alone products. We opened each label PDF and recorded its application number, FDA Reference ID, and the specific warning change, so you can verify any row without opening a file yourself. Every label in this table was revised 2/2026 and approved February 12, 2026.
| Product | FDA category | Active ingredient / form | NDA / supplement | FDA Reference ID | What the boxed warning now shows | FDA label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijuva | Systemic estrogen + progestogen | Estradiol + progesterone, oral capsules | NDA 210132 / s013 | 5744948 | No boxed warning. The label’s Recent Major Changes list records the “Boxed Warning, Cardiovascular Disorders, Probable Dementia, Breast Cancer, and Endometrial Cancer removed 2/2026.” | PDF ↑ |
| Divigel | Systemic estrogen-alone | Estradiol gel, transdermal (applied to the thigh) | NDA 022038 / s017 | 5744952 | Endometrial cancer only. Recent Major Changes records “Boxed Warning, Cardiovascular Disorders, Breast Cancer, Probable Dementia removed 2/2026.” | PDF ↑ |
| Cenestin | Systemic estrogen-alone | Synthetic conjugated estrogens, A — oral tablets | NDA 020992 / s043 | 5744928 | Endometrial cancer only. Same Recent Major Changes removal line as Divigel. | PDF ↑ |
| Enjuvia | Systemic estrogen-alone | Synthetic conjugated estrogens, B — oral tablets | NDA 021443 / s014 | 5744927 | Endometrial cancer only. Same Recent Major Changes removal line as Divigel. | PDF ↑ |
| Prometrium | Systemic progestogen-alone | Progesterone, USP — oral capsules (100 mg / 200 mg) | NDA 019781 / s026 | 5744934 | No boxed warning present. Older-format label with no Recent Major Changes box; we confirmed the boxed warning’s absence directly from the current label. | PDF ↑ |
| Estring | Topical (local) vaginal estrogen | Estradiol vaginal ring (~7.5 mcg/day over 90 days) | NDA 020472 / s022 | 5744942 | No boxed warning present. Older-format label; we confirmed the boxed warning’s absence directly from the current label. Safety information is condensed to the local vaginal formulation. | PDF ↑ |
Source: Each product’s FDA-approved label at accessdata.fda.gov, read and recorded by The HRT Index on July 1, 2026; product list from FDA’s “Menopausal Hormone Therapies with Updated Prescribing Information.” Prometrium and Estring use an older label format without a “Recent Major Changes” section; for these two, the boxed-warning status reflects the current label’s actual content as we read it, not a dated changelog line.
Who holds each application, and when it moved. These fields draw on the FDA supplement approval letters where we could retrieve them, and on the current label otherwise. Submission dates are shown only where confirmed from a product’s FDA approval letter.
| Product | Company on FDA label / supplement applicant | Supplement received | Supplement approved | Verified from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijuva | Mayne Pharma | — | Feb. 12, 2026 | 2026 label; FDA press announcement |
| Divigel | Vertical Pharmaceuticals, LLC | Nov. 25, 2025 | Feb. 12, 2026 | FDA approval letter (Ref ID 5744952) |
| Cenestin | Aspen Pharma USA Inc. | Nov. 20, 2025 | Feb. 12, 2026 | FDA approval letter (Ref ID 5744928) |
| Enjuvia | Aspen Pharma USA Inc. | — | Feb. 12, 2026 | 2026 label (applicant); FDA press announcement |
| Prometrium | Acertis Pharmaceuticals LLC | Jan. 7, 2026 | Feb. 12, 2026 | FDA approval letter (Ref ID 5744934) |
| Estring | Pfizer | — | Feb. 12, 2026 | FDA records (applicant); FDA press announcement |
Source: FDA supplement approval letters for Prometrium (NDA 019781/s026), Divigel (NDA 022038/s017), and Cenestin (NDA 020992/s043), read by The HRT Index July 1, 2026; current FDA labels for the remaining applicant names; FDA press announcement (Feb. 12, 2026) for the approval date. Note: earlier trade coverage listed different companies for some products (for example, Teva or Abbott); we defer to the FDA approval letters and current labels. Download: FDA HRT Label Change Tracker (CSV), verified July 1, 2026.
What exactly did the FDA change on the labels?
For the affected products, the FDA removed three risk topics — cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and probable dementia — from the boxed warning, which is the agency’s most prominent, black-bordered safety alert. It also dropped the old “use the lowest effective dose for the shortest time” instruction from the box and, for systemic products, added language inviting earlier treatment. The changes are not identical across categories, which is the part most summaries flatten.
Here is the change broken down by category. This matrix is assembled from the FDA’s November 10, 2025 formal request to manufacturers, then checked against what the six approved labels actually say.
| Labeling element | Systemic estrogen + progestogen (Bijuva) | Systemic estrogen-alone (Divigel, Cenestin, Enjuvia) | Systemic progestogen-alone (Prometrium) | Topical vaginal estrogen (Estring) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular disease — in the boxed warning | Removed | Removed | Removed | Removed |
| Breast cancer — in the boxed warning | Removed | Removed | Removed | Removed |
| Probable dementia — in the boxed warning | Removed | Removed | Removed | Removed |
| Probable dementia — as a Warnings and Precautions warning | Removed | Removed | Removed | Removed |
| WHI Memory Study dementia data — in Clinical Studies section | Retained | Retained | Not applicable (progesterone-only) | Retained |
| Endometrial cancer — in the boxed warning | Removed | RETAINED | Not applicable | Removed |
| “Lowest effective dose, shortest duration” line in the box | Removed | Removed | Removed | Removed |
| Cardiovascular + breast-cancer information kept elsewhere (Warnings and Precautions) | Retained | Retained | Progestin-related risk noted | Condensed to the formulation |
| Added: consider initiating systemic estrogen therapy if under 60 or within 10 years of menopause | Added in the Bijuva label | Added in the Divigel, Cenestin, and Enjuvia labels | Not a Prometrium-specific instruction (progestogen taken with systemic estrogen) | Not applicable |
| Net result on the label | No boxed warning | Boxed warning = endometrial cancer only | No boxed warning | No boxed warning; safety text condensed |
Source: FDA, “FDA Requests Labeling Changes Related to Safety Information to Clarify the Benefit/Risk Considerations for Menopausal Hormone Therapies” (Nov. 10, 2025), cross-checked against the six approved FDA labels read by The HRT Index, July 1, 2026. The highlighted RETAINED cell marks the endometrial-cancer warning that survived on systemic estrogen-alone products.
The Divigel, Cenestin, and Enjuvia labels each carry a “Recent Major Changes” section that reads, almost word for word, “Boxed Warning, Cardiovascular Disorders, Breast Cancer, Probable Dementia removed 2/2026.” Bijuva’s version goes one item further and also lists “Endometrial Cancer removed,” because a combination estrogen-plus-progestogen product does not need the endometrial-cancer boxed warning in the first place — the progestogen protects the uterine lining.
One nuance the fast coverage missed: the FDA removed the probable-dementia warningfrom the boxed warning and, in the modern-format labels, from the Warnings and Precautions section — but the underlying Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study dementia data still appears in the Clinical Studies section of the estrogen-containing labels. The warning language went; the study data stayed. If you are describing this change, “the dementia warning was removed” is accurate; “dementia was erased from the labels” is not.
The one warning that did not disappear
If you take one caveat from this page, take this: the boxed warning did not vanish for every product. Systemic estrogen-alone products still carry a boxed warning about endometrial cancer in women who have a uterus and take estrogen without a progestogen. We confirmed it on the current Divigel, Cenestin, and Enjuvia labels, where the only remaining boxed warning is titled, in the label’s own words, “Endometrial Cancer With Unopposed Estrogen in Women With a Uterus.”
This is the detail that trips up fast coverage. “The FDA removed the HRT black box warning” is true for the cardiovascular, breast-cancer, and dementia language, and true across the board for probable dementia. It is not true for endometrial cancer on estrogen-alone products. The FDA’s own November request drew this line explicitly: remove the endometrial-cancer language from boxed warnings “except in the systemic estrogen-alone drugs.” Leave that exception out and you have overstated the change.
For a broader look at the terminology used in FDA HRT labels, including boxed warnings, Warnings and Precautions, and Clinical Studies sections, see the Menopause and HRT Glossary.
How we built and verified this FDA HRT label change tracker
We built this the slow way. We started from the FDA’s public product list, pulled the six label PDFs it links to, and read each one — recording the application and supplement number, the FDA Reference ID printed on the pages, the boxed-warning content, and, where present, the “Recent Major Changes” changelog. For three products (Prometrium, Divigel, Cenestin), we also pulled the FDA supplement approval letters to confirm the application holder and the submission and approval dates. We then reconciled the removed-versus-retained detail against the FDA’s formal November 10, 2025 request to manufacturers, which itemizes the intended changes category by category.
- Primary sources first. FDA product pages, FDA label PDFs, and FDA approval letters are the authority for every cell in the tracker. FDA press materials establish the policy context. Trade and news coverage is used only for background, never as the basis for a factual claim in the tracker.
- What we captured per product.Product name, FDA category, active ingredient and form, NDA and supplement number, FDA Reference ID, boxed-warning status, warnings retained elsewhere, and — where the approval letter was available — application holder and submission/approval dates.
- Verification date.July 1, 2026. Every “verified” claim on this page reflects a source we opened on that date.
- Inclusion rule.A product appears here only if it is listed on the FDA’s “Menopausal Hormone Therapies with Updated Prescribing Information” page and we confirmed the change in its actual FDA label.
- Honest gaps.Two labels (Prometrium and Estring) use an older format without a “Recent Major Changes” section; for those, we report the current label’s actual boxed-warning content and say so plainly. We retrieved three of the six approval letters; submission dates appear only for those three.
- Refresh sources. For ongoing updates we monitor the FDA product page, FDA press announcements, the FDA Drug Safety-related Labeling Changes database, and Drugs@FDA.
The timeline: how the HRT boxed warning appeared, and how it is disappearing
The boxed warning is roughly two decades old. It grew out of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), the large federal trials that reshaped how hormone therapy was prescribed. Understanding the 2026 change means understanding that arc — the studies, the 2003 labeling, and the 2025–2026 reversal.
| Date | Event | Label-status significance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | The Women’s Health Initiative launches, enrolling more than 160,000 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 across its trials and observational study. | Evidence program, not a label event | NIH / WHI |
| July 2002 | The WHI estrogen-plus-progestin trial is stopped early; results in JAMA report increased breast-cancer, coronary, stroke, and clot signals. | Evidence event that triggered the warnings | JAMA 2002;288(3):321–333 |
| January 2003 | The FDA begins class-wide labeling changes for estrogen and estrogen-plus-progestin products; these eventually include the boxed warning. | The boxed warning era begins | FDA; JAMA 2003;289(5):537–538 |
| May 2003 | The WHI Memory Study reports increased probable-dementia risk in women aged 65–79. | Basis for the dementia warning | JAMA 2003;289(20):2651–2662 |
| 2004 | The WHI estrogen-alone trial is stopped early after an increased stroke signal and no coronary-prevention benefit. | Extends warnings to estrogen-alone products | FDA; WHI |
| July 17, 2025 | The FDA convenes an expert panel on the risks and benefits of menopausal hormone therapy; a public comment period follows. | Review stage, not a label change | FDA request page |
| November 10, 2025 | HHS and the FDA announce the initiative and formally request labeling changes from manufacturers. | FDA request, not an approval | FDA / HHS; JAMA 2025, doi:10.1001/jama.2025.22259 |
| February 12, 2026 | The FDA approves the first batch of six updated labels, covering all four categories, and updates its public product list. | First-batch approval | FDA press announcement, Feb. 12, 2026 |
| July 1, 2026 | This tracker’s verification date. The FDA’s public list still shows the same six products. | Tracker verification date | The HRT Index |
Source: FDA “FDA Requests Labeling Changes…” (Nov. 10, 2025) and FDA press announcement (Feb. 12, 2026) for the 2025–2026 events; WHI and JAMA publications for the 2002–2004 record. Historical dates corroborated across FDA statements and the cited JAMA papers. Last verified July 1, 2026.
Two dates in that table do a lot of work. November 10, 2025 is when the FDA asked for the changes. February 12, 2026 is when the FDA approvedthe first six. Coverage that treats November 2025 as the moment the labels changed is early by three months. (A small primary-source detail we noticed in the approval letters: the FDA’s request letters to manufacturers were actually dated November 9, 2025 — one day before the public announcement.)
Why the FDA reopened the HRT boxed warning
According to the FDA, the change followed its review of the scientific literature published since the original WHI trials, an updated look at how the drugs are actually prescribed, public input, and the July 2025 expert panel. The agency’s central argument is about age and timing: the women in the WHI trials were, on average, well past the age when most women start hormone therapy for symptoms.
Here is that rationale reduced to the specific figures the FDA cited, so it is quotable without paraphrasing the agency’s narrative.
| The FDA’s argument | The data point it cited | Primary source |
|---|---|---|
| The WHI studied older women than those who start therapy for symptoms | Average WHI participant was about 63 years old | FDA request page |
| Symptoms typically start earlier | Bothersome vasomotor symptoms are most common at ages 45–55; average U.S. age of menopause is about 51 | FDA request page |
| The dementia findings came from an even older group | The WHI Memory Study enrolled women aged 65–79 | FDA request page |
| The drugs are underused | In 2020, about 2 million U.S. women aged 46–65 received a systemic hormone-therapy prescription, against about 41 million women aged 45–64 | FDA request page (2020 Census + FDA drug-utilization data) |
| Symptoms are common | About 34% of women aged 45–65 have moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms | FDA request page (citing Nappi et al., 2021) |
Source: FDA, “FDA Requests Labeling Changes Related to Safety Information…” (Nov. 10, 2025). Figures are the FDA’s, as stated in that document.
That is the FDA’s reasoning, presented as the FDA states it. Whether the reassessment goes too far, especially for systemic therapy, is genuinely contested — which is the next section.
How medical societies responded
The reaction split along a clear line: broad support for lifting the warning on low-dose vaginal estrogen, and support-with-caveats for doing the same on systemic therapy. Two leading menopause societies weighed in within a week, and both paired approval with an explicit warning against over-prescribing.
| Organization | Date | What it supported | What it cautioned |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Menopause Society (U.S.) | Nov. 10, 2025 | Agreed with removing the boxed warning on low-dose vaginal estrogen, describing it as a safe, effective therapy the warning may have deterred women from using | Systemic estrogen still carries potential risks in certain individuals that should be reviewed in detail before starting therapy |
| European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) | Nov. 17, 2025 | Welcomed removal from all estrogen-containing MHT, including vaginal estrogen, calling the original WHI interpretation overly broad | Warned against swinging to the opposite extreme: MHT is not indicated to prevent cardiovascular disease or dementia and is not for everyone; in its words, “the goal is appropriate prescribing, not maximal prescribing” |
Source: The Menopause Society, “The Menopause Society Comments on the FDA Announcement on Hormone Therapy” (Nov. 10, 2025); menopause.org. European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS), statement on the FDA decision (Nov. 17, 2025); emas-online.org.
The announcement also arrived with strong benefit claims from HHS about hormone therapy’s advantages when started early. Those figures are the government’s framing, not label-tracker findings, and this page deliberately does not repeat them as established benefit statistics — our scope is what the labels say, verifiably.
The rollout so far: six products approved, more supplements to watch
The reason this needs to be a tracker rather than a one-time article is the gap between what has been approved and what is coming. The FDA has said 29 drug companies submitted proposed labeling changes, and it described the six approved products as the first batch. As of July 1, 2026, the FDA’s public list still shows those same six.
A few things to keep straight. “29 companies” is a count of companies, not products — a single company can hold several hormone-therapy products, so the eventual number of updated labels is not simply “29.” The six approved so far were chosen to represent all four categories, which is why the list looks broad despite being short. And the companies did not move in lockstep: per the FDA approval letters, Cenestin’s supplement was received November 20, 2025 and Divigel’s November 25, 2025, while Prometrium’s was not received until January 7, 2026 — yet all six were approved the same day, February 12, 2026. Because each product’s label updates only when its own supplement is approved, your specific medication may not have an updated label yet, even if a sibling product in the same category does.
We re-check the FDA’s list and the underlying labels on a schedule and update the verification date whenever we confirm a change.
| Element that will change | How often we re-check | How we verify |
|---|---|---|
| Number and identity of listed products | Frequently in the near term, then monthly | Re-read the FDA product page and its linked labels |
| FDA Reference IDs and revision dates | Monthly | Reopen each FDA label PDF |
| Boxed-warning status per product | Monthly | Confirm against the current label text |
| Application holders and submission dates | When a new product is added | Read the product’s FDA approval letter |
| “29 companies / first batch” framing | When the FDA publishes an update | FDA press releases and drug-alert pages |
| The visible “Last verified” date | On every confirmed check | Updated only after re-reading the primary sources |
Source: The HRT Index editorial process; FDA product page, label PDFs, and approval letters are the verification targets.
For context on which HRT products are currently available and categorized, see the FDA-Approved HRT Reference. For supply-side news, see the Estradiol Patch Shortage Tracker.
What this tracker does — and does not — show
This is a regulatory-label reference, and it is worth being blunt about its edges, because a good source discloses them.
- It tracks public FDA source material, not private manufacturer submissions still in review.
- Six products on the FDA’s page does not equal every hormone-therapy product; more are likely.
- “29 companies submitted proposals” is a company count, not a product count, and not a countdown.
- A risk statement removed from the boxed warning is not a statement that the risk is impossible or irrelevant. In several labels, cardiovascular and breast-cancer information remains in the Warnings and Precautions section, and the WHI Memory Study dementia data remains in Clinical Studies.
- Labels can be revised again. That is exactly why the page carries a visible verification date.
- This page is educational and not medical advice. Decisions about starting, continuing, or stopping hormone therapy belong with a qualified clinician, using your current FDA-approved label and your personal medical history.
Frequently asked questions
Did the FDA remove the black box warning from all HRT?
Not entirely. The FDA removed cardiovascular-disease, breast-cancer, and probable-dementia language from the boxed warning across the affected products, and removed the probable-dementia warning from the Warnings and Precautions section of the modern-format labels, but systemic estrogen-alone products still carry a boxed warning about endometrial cancer in women with a uterus.
Which HRT products have updated FDA labels in 2026?
As of July 1, 2026, the FDA lists six products with updated prescribing information: Bijuva, Divigel, Cenestin, Enjuvia, Prometrium, and Estring, spanning all four hormone-therapy categories. Three of the six (Divigel, Cenestin, Enjuvia) are systemic estrogen-alone products.
When did the FDA change the HRT labels?
The FDA announced the initiative and requested the changes on November 10, 2025, and approved the first batch of six updated labels on February 12, 2026.
Does the change apply to vaginal estrogen?
Yes. For local vaginal estrogen the boxed warning was removed and the safety information condensed to fit the formulation. Estring is the first vaginal product confirmed on the FDA’s updated list, and its current label carries no boxed warning.
Was the dementia warning removed from the labels?
The probable-dementia warning was removed from the boxed warning and from the Warnings and Precautions section of the modern-format labels. The labels still discuss the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study dementia data in their Clinical Studies sections; the warning was removed, not the underlying study data.
Does “warning removed” mean HRT is now risk-free?
No. Removing a statement from the most prominent warning box changes how risk is communicated, not the underlying biology. Some risk information remains elsewhere in the labels, and the decision itself is still debated among clinicians.
Is this tracker medical advice?
No. It is an educational regulatory reference and source index. Individual hormone-therapy decisions should be made with a qualified clinician using the current FDA-approved label and your own medical history.